A short version of the physical activity enjoyment scale: Development and psychometric properties

Objective: The purposes of this paper were to (a) develop a new short, theory-driven, version of the physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES-S) using content analysis; and (b) subsequently to measure the psychometric properties (construct validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and concurrent validity) of the PACES-S for adolescents. Methods: Six experts used a four-point Likert scale to assess the content validity of each of the 16 items of the physical activity enjoyment scale according to a provided definition of physical activity enjoyment. Based on the results, exploratory factor analysis was used to analyze survey data from a longitudinal study of 182 individuals (Measure 1 of Study 1: 15.75 ± 3.39 yrs; 56.6% boys, 43.4% girls), and confirmatory factor analysis (Measure 2 of Study 1: 15.69 ± 3.44 yrs; 56.3% boys, 43.7% girls) was used to analyze the survey data from a cross-sectional study of 3219 individuals (Study 2; 15.99 ± 3.10 yrs; 47.8% boys, 52.2% girls) to assess the construct validity of the new measure. ... mehrTo assess the reliability, test–retest reliability was assessed in Study 1 and internal consistency in Study 1 and 2. For the concurrent validity, correlations with self-reported and device-based physical activity behavior were assessed in both studies. Results: Four out of sixteen items were selected for PACES-S. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analyses identified and supported its factorial validity (χ$^{2}$ = 53.62, df = 2, p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.073; CFI = 0.99; RFI = 0.96; NFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.96; IFI = 0.99). Results showed good test–retest reliability (r = 0.76) and internal consistency (a = 0.82 to 0.88). Regarding concurrent validity, the results showed positive correlations with a physical activity questionnaire (Study 1: r = 0.36), with a physical activity diary (Study 1: r = 0.44), and with accelerometer-recorded data (Study 1: r = 0.32; Study 2: r = 0.21). Conclusions: The results indicate that PACES-S is a reliable and valid instrument that may be particularly useful to measure physical activity enjoyment in large-scale studies. It shows comparable measurement properties as the long version of PACES.

Objective: The purposes of this paper were to (a) develop a new short, theory-driven,
version of the physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES-S) using content analysis; and (b) subse quently to measure the psychometric properties (construct validity, internal consistency, test–retest
reliability, and concurrent validity) of the PACES-S for adolescents. Methods: Six experts used a
four-point Likert scale to assess the content validity of each of the 16 items of the physical activity
enjoyment scale according to a provided definition of physical activity enjoyment. Based on the
... mehr
results, exploratory factor analysis was used to analyze survey data from a longitudinal study of
182 individuals (Measure 1 of Study 1: 15.75 ± 3.39 yrs; 56.6% boys, 43.4% girls), and confirmatory
factor analysis (Measure 2 of Study 1: 15.69 ± 3.44 yrs; 56.3% boys, 43.7% girls) was used to analyze
the survey data from a cross-sectional study of 3219 individuals (Study 2; 15.99 ± 3.10 yrs; 47.8% boys,
52.2% girls) to assess the construct validity of the new measure. To assess the reliability, test–retest
reliability was assessed in Study 1 and internal consistency in Study 1 and 2. For the concurrent
validity, correlations with self-reported and device-based physical activity behavior were assessed
in both studies. Results: Four out of sixteen items were selected for PACES-S. Exploratory factor
analysis and confirmatory factor analyses identified and supported its factorial validity (χ
2 = 53.62,
df = 2, p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.073; CFI = 0.99; RFI = 0.96; NFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.96; IFI = 0.99). Results
showed good test–retest reliability (r = 0.76) and internal consistency (a = 0.82 to 0.88). Regarding
concurrent validity, the results showed positive correlations with a physical activity questionnaire
(Study 1: r = 0.36), with a physical activity diary (Study 1: r = 0.44), and with accelerometer-recorded
data (Study 1: r = 0.32; Study 2: r = 0.21). Conclusions: The results indicate that PACES-S is a reliable
and valid instrument that may be particularly useful to measure physical activity enjoyment in
large-scale studies. It shows comparable measurement properties as the long version of PACES.