Capturing Flow Experiences in Everyday Life: A Comparison of Recall and Momentary Measurement

In a real-life study using time-based ambulatory assessment, we investigated how to un-
obtrusively capture within-subject and between-subject variations in flow in everyday life.
We compared two observation approaches, momentary states, and coverage, which dif-
fered in the reference of flow reports and sampling frequency. Depending on condition,
participants (N = 38) answered either ten or five queries per day that referred to the cur-
rent state or the last two hours (n = 1442 observations in total). We found no effect of
either approach on compliance, flow intensity, or flow reports over time. However, the
approaches differed with respect to flow probability reports, within-subject variability in
flow reports, and perceived burden. In addition, we introduced a reduced three-item ver-
sion of the Flow Short Scale. Our results indicate acceptable to good reliability as well as
concurrent, convergent and discriminant validity of this scale. Based on our findings, we
recommend that the choice of observation approach for capturing everyday flow depends
on the outcome of interest, the targeted comparison within- or between-subjects, and the
... mehr
expected task variability of the participants. Limitations regarding our sampling procedure
and the retrospective assessment of flow experiences are discussed.