Inconsistent Belief Aggregation in Diverse and Polarised Groups

How do opinion diversity and belief polarisation affect epistemic group decision-making,
particularly if decisions must be made without delay and on the basis of permissive evidence? In an agent-based model, we track the consistency of group opinions aggregated through sentence-wise majority voting. Simulations on the model reveal that high opinion diversity, but not polarisation, incurs a significant inconsistency risk. These results indicate that epistemic group decisions based on permissive evidence can be particularly difficult for
diverse groups. The results also improve our understanding of what can reasonably be
expected of expert groups, and where expert advice might have limits.