Superconducting properties of the strain-free Fe(Se,Te) film

The mismatch in lattice or thermal expansion coefficients between iron-based superconducting thin
films and their substrates significantly affects the superconducting transition temperature (Tc) [1].
Bulk single crystals, generally used as strain-free references, are not ideal for comparison due to the
non-equilibrium growth conditions of thin films. Freestanding thin films, grown under identical
conditions and separated from the substrate, are better for accurate comparisons. This study used
Fe(Se,Te), the simplest iron-based superconductor, to fabricate freestanding thin films via three
methods.
The films were prepared by pulsed laser deposition with a KrF excimer laser. Initially, a CeO$_2$
buffer was deposited on an SrTiO$_3$(STO)(001) substrate. Freestanding thin films were fabricated
through three methods: (1) peeling the superconducting layer with a razor blade (Film B), (2)
applying epoxy resin to a quartz substrate, placing Fe(Se,Te) thin films on top, and holding for 10
hours to ensure sufficient solidification, followed by cleaving the film, and (3) using water-soluble
Sr$_3$Al$_2$O$_6$ layers on STO and LaAlO$_3$(LAO) (001) substrates, followed by immersion in deionized
... mehr
water (Film D and E).
Figure 1(a) shows X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of as-grown thin films, Film B, and Film C. The
weak 00l peak intensity in Films B and C is due to reduced Fe(Se,Te) volume fractions after
detachment or cleavage. Figure 1(b) highlights the 004 peak shift to higher angles in Films B and C
compared to as-grown films. The onset Tc decreased from about 17 K (as-grown) to 14 K for Films
B and C, comparable to bulk crystals [2]. Figure 1(c) shows the XRD patterns of Films D and E, with
all layers oriented along [001]. Before immersion, we confirmed zero resistance at approximately 4
K and 6 K for Films D and E, respectively.